In die oog van die Weskus-stormwinde: Myne en munisipale amptenare en die Mammon-god

Terwyl die Weskus nog wag op ‘n nuwe, amptelike munisipale bestuurder wat die omstrede Dr Louis Scheepers se pos (en vet salaris van R1,8 miljoen) kan oorneem, is stormwinde ook aan die opsteek oor SBM-raadslede wat sommer dadelik die hoogste moontlike salarisse wil hê. Intussen kry Mike Nunn se omstrede Elandsfontein/KROPZ-fosfaatmyn opnuut die wind van voor uit nuwe internasionale oorde nadat die myn glo verlede week ‘n atmosferiese emissie-lisensie vir sy droogoond toegestaan is.

Louis Scheepers

Die voortslepende sage rondom Scheepers se afdanking oor ‘n minimum-kwalifikasie en sy daaropvolgende dispuut met die SBM het die wenkbroue laat lig toe dit aan die lig kom dat Scheepers ‘n allemintige R1,8 m per jaar verdien het, terwyl die maksimum salaris vir sy pos volgens die SBM-kategorieskaal net sowat R1,4 m beloop. Sy opvolger sou dus noodgedwonge minder as hy verdien en tot dusver was daar glo net twee kandidate uit meer as 35 aansoeke wat aan al die vereistes voldoen het. Daar word nou steeds gesoek na ‘n geskikte nuwe munisipale bestuurder terwyl Jacques Marais, SBM direkteur van gemeenskaps- en operasionele dienste, solank waarneem.
 
Intussen het Scheepers glo ‘n pos as uitvoerende direkteur by Stad Kaapstad losgeslaan terwyl hy steeds die gewraakte kwalifikasie moet verwerf en keer dit hom nie om sy dispuut met die SBM voort te sit nie, wat nou verwys is vir arbitrasie.
 
Terwyl almal nog wonder hoe Scheepers en die SBM se top-beampte van finansies (R1,5 m per jaar) dit reggekry het om sulke buitensporige salarisse te beding, het die SBM se splinternuwe raadslede blykbaar ook besluit om sommer dadelik vir die hoogste salarisse te mik sedert die SBM opgradeer is na ‘n Graad 4-munisipaliteit. ‘n Spesiale raadsvergadering is glo verlede week spesiaal hiervoor belê en het ‘n herrie op sosiale media veroorsaak. Die salaris-aanpassings behels glo verhogings van bykans 20% vir gewone raadslede, terwyl meer senior amptenare s’n meer as verdubbel. Die raadsbesluit is egter nog onderhewig aan goedkeuring van Anton Bredell, Wes-Kaapse minister van plaaslike regering, omgewingsake en beplanning.
 
Dié omstrede raadsbesluit is wyd veroordeel en as gulsig, gierig en selfverrykend gekritiseer op sosiale media. Daar is gevra of die raadslede se salarisaanpassings nie eerder op meriete gegrond moet wees nie en of dit geregverdig kan word dat raadslede onmiddellik die hoogste kerf op die nuwe salarisskaal eis terwyl daar nie geld vir noodsaaklike dienste en instandhoudingsprojekte, ens. is nie.
Strydros Jaco Kotze, wat die besluit teengestaan het, het onder meer gesê: “Ek het nog nie die persentasies op die verskeie skale bereken nie, maar ‘n gewone raadslid se jaarlikse vergoeding het vanaf R228 000.00 na R273 000.00 verhoog. Burgemeesters, onder-burgemeesters, Speakers en Artikel 79-voorsitters (portefeuljekomitee-voorsitters) s’n is meer as dubbeld meer.”
 
Op ‘n ander mynveld waar die stormwinde fel voortwoed, het twee internasionale organisasies Environmental Defender Law Clinic en die American Association for the Advancement of Science nou hul gewig gegooi by die Weskus Omgewingsbewaringsassosiasie (WOBA) in ‘n hernieude poging om KROPZ se mynplanne te stuit. Die enigste speek in die wiel wat mynbedrywighede nog kniehalter, is ‘n uitstaande watergebruiklisensie . . . ‘n baie sensitiewe en emosionele kwessie in die huidige Wes-Kaapse waternood.
mynn
 
Dit blyk Nunn het daarop staatgemaak dat geen hof of wet die mynbedrywighede op so ‘n gevorderde stadium sal kan stop nie.
Die omstredenheid rondom die aanvanklike toekenning van die mynlisensie en die daaropvolgende stoomrollery bo-oor alle besware, impakstudies en ‘n hangende hofsaak, is egter groenvoer vir ‘n waterskeidingsaak om die korrupsie en chaos in die SA mynbedryf vir eens en altyd op te los. Die knellende droogte kan dalk net die voortsnellende mynmasjien se wiele tot stilstand laat knars . . .
 
Lees ook meer hier: (Copy and paste link into Url)

 

http://www.miningmx.com/news/markets/28664-nunns-kropz-wary-push-back-political-noise-grows/

Nunn’s Kropz wary of “push back” as political noise grows

2
Mike Nunn, CEO, Kropz

MIKE Nunn, the mining entrepreneur that brought us Tanzanite One which briefly stole the spotlight from diamonds, is back on our screens again as the driving force behind Kropz – a privately-owned company that also has Patrice Motsepe as a backer.

The basic premise of Kropz is to improve South Africa’s food security by mining and beneficiating phosphate, a mineral used to fertilize soils. Apart from ticking the box of beneficiation, its development will also lower the country’s need to import phosphate from Europe.

Motsepe’s involvement is through African Rainbow Capital which is owned by Ubuntu Botho – a philanthropic organisation that has the Motsepe Family Trust, church and womens’ groups, and trade unions as stakeholders.

The last time we encountered Nunn he was bravely taking on Zimbabwe’s government in a $500m legal suit heard in the International Court of Arbitration in Paris during 2014 which challenged the award of platinum-bearing mineral rights to a government-backed Russian consortium.

Nunn claimed his company, Amari Platinum Holdings, had spent money prospecting the land but had been denied a mining right by then mines minister, Obert Mpofu. Nunn won the case but it’s unclear if the monies were ever paid.

Around the same time, Amari Platinum was involved in the seizure of $50m worth of diamonds in Antwerp, Belgium on behalf of expat Zimbabwean farmers who claim to have been forced off their land and were taking the diamonds in compensation. This bid didn’t succeed.

Kropz on the other hand is seeking to usher in a somewhat more peaceful return to Southern Africa business for Nunn; its logo even sports a green heart where the ‘o’ should go. Yet there’s controversy afoot.

Former finance minister, Trevor Manuel, in October demanded the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) “clean up its act” after it granted a permit to Kropz whose mine is situated next to the Langebaan Lagoon which is part of the West Coast National Park.

Manuel railed against “inconsistent application of regulations” by the DMR and described the entire ecosystem around Langebaan Lagoon as environmentally sensitive: “How was it granted a permit to operate when there’s no water licence agreement for that mine in that place?”, he asked.

The mine is Elandsfontein which in its first phase will produce 1.5 million tonnes of rock concentrate following a capital cost of R1.35bn. The mine is fully funded, has a ready market, and will start production in March 2017, says Michelle Lawrence, its chief operating officer.

“We think we can change perceptions around the mining if we make the right decisions upfront,” she says. “It will be a success story in terms of rehabilitation.” Currently, Kropz is dewatering the mining area in order to completely rule out possible poisoning a major acquifier than runs into the lagoon.

There is ‘push-back’, however, says Lawrence. West coast environmental groups are concerned about the impact of the mine and whilst Kropz believes it has ticked all the boxes in due diligence and execution – there may be more political noise to come.

The West Coast Environmental Protection Association (WCEPA) is crying foul. Carika van Zyl, WCEPA chairwoman, said due process was not followed in the case of Elandsfontein’s permitting process.

The view of Kropz is that its mining permits were granted under the DMR’s one-stop-shop system which exempts it from conditions of the National Environment Management Act (NEMA). In terms of NEMA, a properly filed appeal over a mining project is enough to trigger a mandatory suspension until the details of the objection have been properly picked through.

Also read: 

EEM/Kropz have started a charity as part of their “Social Responsibility” program called the Greenheart Foundation. The illegal road, which was built without Environmental Authorization and without keeping to the conditions of the building of the road as set out by the Saldanha Bay Municipality, is also called the Greenheart road.
Where does this word come from?
The Greenheart term was first captured in a article with a caption that read: ” Battle for the greenheart of the West Coast”, the petition which was started at the same time to hand over to Hellen Zille to be taken to parliament, was titled: Save the Greenheart of the West Coast and Langebaan Lagoon” Could this be a subliminal message from them? To show us what they think of our green heart?

Interesting how EEM/Kropz are stating in the below article that they are following the letter of the law, but have in the past three years ignored every comment from state departments and Interested and Affected Parties, closed the Public Participation process for the Water Use License and are acting unlawfully without Environmental Authorization as pointed out by the Department of Environmental Affairs. They further promise that they will not touch the aquifers water, but in their Water Use License they request 4.5 million liters of water from the aquifer.

http://oxpeckers.org/…/battle-for-the-green-heart-of-the-w…/

 

 http://www.miningmx.com/news/markets/28664-nunns-kropz-wary-push-back-political-noise-grows/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *